Volume 18, no. 3Pages 27 - 38

On the Formulation of Boundary Conditions When Solving Hydrodynamic Problems in Vorticity-Stream Function Variables

I.I. Potapov
When solving the Navier-Stokes problem in vorticity - current function variables, the scientist always faces the problem of redefined boundary conditions for the current function and their absence for the vorticity function. The classical approach to solving this problem is to construct an additional differential operator for the desired functions on the boundary of the domain, from the solution of which intermediate boundary conditions for the vorticity function can be determined. Despite the significant progress achieved in the implementation of this approach, it has two serious drawbacks. First, it requires the construction of a differential operator normal to the boundary at each boundary node of the computational domain, which significantly complicates algorithms for problems with curved boundaries. Secondly, it generates an additional iterative process even when solving the linear Stokes problem.
The paper proposes a new algorithm that makes it possible to determine boundary conditions in the finite element method when solving problems of hydrodynamics in variables vorticity as a function of current. In the proposed algorithm, the boundary values for vorticity on an arbitrary non-degenerate contour of the boundary of the computational domain are determined from the equation for the current function written in a weak integral form taking into account the Neumann conditions for the current function at the boundary of the domain. The algorithm does not require the construction of additional difference operators on the contour of the area to obtain the boundary conditions of the problem and allows using the vector formulation of the problem to solve the Stokes problem in one iteration. When solving Navier-Stokes problems in a vector formulation, the method makes it possible to obtain consistent vorticity fields and current functions at each time/nonlinearity step, which makes it possible to control the convergence processes of the problem being solved. The stability of the proposed algorithm is confirmed by numerical experiments.
Full text
Keywords
convection; weak problem formulation; boundary conditions; stream function – vorticity; finite element method
References
1. Agarwal R.К. A Third-Order-Accurate Upwind Scheme for Navier-Stokes Solutions at High Reynolds Numbers. AIAA-81-0112 Paper, 1981, 14 p. DOI: 10.2514/6.1981-112
2. Roach P. Computational Fluid Dynamics. Albuquerque, Hermosa Publishers, 1976.
3. Ghia U., Ghia K.N., Shin C.T. High-Re Solutions for Incompressible Flow Using the Navier-Stokes Equations and a Multigrid Method. Journal of Computational Physics, 1982, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 387-411. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(82)90058-4
4. Tarunin E.L. Analysis of Approximation Formulas for the Velocity Vortex on a Solid Boundary. Scientific Notes Perm State Pedagogical Institute. Hydrodynamics, 1976, issue 9, no. 152, pp. 167-178. (in Russian)
5. Zakharchenkov M.N. Problems of Modeling Separated Flow of Viscous Incompressible Fluid around Bodies. Journal of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 1998, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 810-823.
6. Mazo A.B. Computational Fluid Dynamics. Part 2. Grid Schemes of the Finite Element Method. Textbook. Kazan, Kazan University, 2018.
7. Shatrov O.A., Shcheritsa O.V., Mazhorova O.S. Experience of Using the Gauss Method for Solving Difference Navier-Stokes Equations in the Variables ``Stream Function - Vortex''. Preprints of the Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathemaics, 2017, no. 50, 24 p. DOI: 10.20948/prepr-2017-50
8. Potapov I.I., Potapov D.I. Model of Steady River Flow in the Cross-Section of a Curved Channel. Computer Research and Modeling, 2024, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1163-1178. DOI: 10.20537/2076-7633-2024-16-5-1163-1178
9. Potapov I.I., Potapov D.I., Koroleva K.S. On the Movement of a River Flow in the Cross-Section of a Curved Channel. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Computer Sciences. Mechanics, 2024, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.35634/vm240407
10. Bulgakov V.K., Potapov I.I. High-Order Counter-Flow Finite Element Schemes for Heat Transfer Problem. Journal of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2003, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1409-1413.
11. Shabrov N.N. Metod Konechnyh Jelementov v Raschetah Detalej Teplovyh Dvigatelej [Finite Element Method in Calculations of Heat Engine Parts]. Leningrad, Mechanical Engineering, 1983. (in Russian)
12. Nallasamy M., Prasad K.K. On Cavity Flow at High Reynolds Numbers. Journal Fluid Mechanics, 1977, vol. 79, pp. 391-414. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112077000214